I have cited several forms of the cosmological argument for God’s existence on this blog . One effective form of this argument comes from philosopher Norman Geisler. This argument begins from an undeniable premise: I exist. This is not always assumed to be true by modern philosophy. Geisler argues that God exists because I exist. Here’ s a rough outline: 1. Some things undeniably exist (e.g., I cannot deny my own existence). 2. My nonexistence is possible. 3. Whatever has the possibility not to exist is currently caused to exist by another. 4. There cannot be an infinite regress of current causes of existence. 5. Therefore, a first uncaused cause of my current existence exists. 6. This uncaused cause must be infinite, unchanging, all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-perfect. 7. This infinitely perfect Being is appropriately called “God.” 8. Therefore, God exists. 9. This God who exists is identical to the God described in the Christian Scriptures. 10. Therefore, the ...
Comments
You know I roam around academia, and I am so intrigued that folk can simply accept that the universe just sprouted as a quirk of chance.
It kinda shocks me that such intellectual stance is intellectual suicide and they do not blink when they commit it.
LPC
We know where the world is headed.
St. Paul told us about how they would claim to be wise.
Poor fools. Speak the Word and then move on. There's plenty of work to do and a big harvest out there.
Steve, we should cast down every argument...