I have cited several forms of the cosmological argument for God’s existence on this blog . One effective form of this argument comes from philosopher Norman Geisler. This argument begins from an undeniable premise: I exist. This is not always assumed to be true by modern philosophy. Geisler argues that God exists because I exist. Here’ s a rough outline: 1. Some things undeniably exist (e.g., I cannot deny my own existence). 2. My nonexistence is possible. 3. Whatever has the possibility not to exist is currently caused to exist by another. 4. There cannot be an infinite regress of current causes of existence. 5. Therefore, a first uncaused cause of my current existence exists. 6. This uncaused cause must be infinite, unchanging, all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-perfect. 7. This infinitely perfect Being is appropriately called “God.” 8. Therefore, God exists. 9. This God who exists is identical to the God described in the Christian Scriptures. 10. Therefore, the ...
Comments
Does the fact the many American Churches are semi-pelagianism and arminian in their "doctrine", they will preach a "once saved always saved" doctrine that results in the gospel is preached to the unbelievers and the law to the believers. When one is preaching on the Christian life and it's focused on the law, there is no need for Christ.
How many churches have confession and absolution as part of their worship? Every week, we need to hear the Law and the Gospel.
What was his answer?