John Stonestreet on Evil

-
In response to the recent shooting in Aurora, Colorado, John Stonestreet over at Breakpoint does a good job of quickly addressing the problem of evil at this post.

Evil is both a problem for academic philosophers who wrestle with God’s existence and a problem for individuals who wrestle with the pain and suffering they endure.  The two groups overlap (what academic philosopher has lived a life untouched by evil), but I have little patience for the academic problem. 

Many times when someone brings up a specific example of evil that he feels invalidates God’s existence, he admits that he is not personally trying to eliminate the very suffering he finds so repugnant.  It is difficult for me to respect that. 

In addition, as Stonestreet points out in his article, a person who uses the problem of evil as a philosophical argument must provide a rationale for the existence of evil.  In a materialistic world, what gives a person the right to say something is evil?  I am not asking about behavior; I am asking about rational justification.  The bottom line is that a person must borrow from the Christian view of the world in order to criticize the Christian view of the world.

The personal problem of evil moves me at an emotional level.  What Christian has never questioned the way God orders the events in his or her own life when pain and suffering come?  However, I will continue to hold a view of the world that allows me to call human pain and suffering“evil.” In Christianity, all people are made in God’s image.  All people have intrinsic worth.  Evil is “real” evil, not just imagined evil. 
This is a help to me emotionally.  Evil becomes an enemy that I can combat. 

Why does God allow evil in certain circumstances?  I have no idea.  I know that humans as sinners do not deserve painless existence.  I know that my own sins qualify me for nothing but hell if I face God on my own merits. 
However, the main balm to my emotional pain is the suffering of Jesus Christ.  God in the Person of Jesus Christ came to earth with a mission to endure the greatest pain and suffering imaginable.  He suffered many of the specific types of pain that I have had to endure (rejection by friends, having people misunderstand Him because of the message He was to deliver, etc.).  He also endured the wrath of God the Father on the cross for the sins of the world (John 3:16). 

I know of no other religion that has a conception of a God who would suffer.  All other gods stand aloof from the world and never enter its pain.  The Christian God is one I respect.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Your ignorance of other mythologies besides your own is not proof of anything.

"I know of no other religion that has a conception of a God who would suffer. All other gods stand aloof from the world and never enter its pain. The Christian God is one I respect."
February 01, 2013
J. K. Jones said…
Kindly give an example.
February 02, 2013
Anonymous said…
It's like your ignorance has a purpose. Here you go little bird.

http://bit.ly/13v5pUi
March 26, 2013
J. K. Jones said…
Which of them suffered for his / her / its people? Which of them suffered at all?
March 30, 2013
Anonymous said…
I can lead a mule to water but I can't make you drink.
April 03, 2013
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Face of Terror

-
Osama Bin laden is dead. Since the rest of the internet is buzzing with opinions on that death, I thought I would weigh in. First, this is not the end of global terrorism. Like the Hydra of old, when one head is chopped off, two more take its place. We still need diligence in our fight against global terror. U. S. and allied Armed Forces still need our prayers. We still need a strong military and intelligence community. We have not yet cut off the Hydra’s immortal head. Second, the way to get to the ‘heart of the matter’ is with Christian missionary efforts. We must reach the people who make up those societies and population segments that produce terrorists . To tell a story I have told here before : Early in the twentieth century, Baptist evangelists preached through rural Mississippi and Alabama with such effectiveness that moonshiners could no longer sell their whiskey: All their customers were getting converted! In desperation, the whiskey sellers hired two men to murder on
Read more

The Canons of Dort

-
I believe that the Canons of Dort are true. This is a statement that came out the Synod of Dort, held from 1618-1619. The Canons of Dort outline the system of theology known today as the “five points of Calvinism.” The problem I have with most “five-point Calvinists” is that the Canons of Dort contain much more than five points. Many explanations of the TULIP (total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace and the perseverance of the saints) are gross simplifications of the Canons of Dort. [This is especially true of explanations given by those who oppose Calvinism. It is easier to knock down a straw man than it is to knock down a real man, and so it is easier to criticize an oversimplified Calvinism that the more robust form.] Some of those who teach the “five points” leave out some of the quotes below: This death of God's Son is the only and entirely complete sacrifice and satisfaction for sins; it is of infinite value and worth, more than
Read more

Intelligent Design

-
The Intelligent Design (ID) movement makes much of the argument from irreducible complexity. Dr. Michael Behe has become famous for a simple example, the mousetrap. He points out that the mousetrap will not perform its function without all of its parts. The wooden base, the metal hammer, a spring, a catch and a metal bar to hold back the hammer are all necessary parts. One component by itself will not catch a mouse. Mainstream evolutionary science has a counter-argument. To paraphrase Dr. Kenneth Miller, if you disassemble the mousetrap, each component can serve as something useful on its own. If we take away the catch and metal bar, we have something left that can serve as a paper clip. The spring could make a simple two-section key chain. The wooden base makes a paperweight. Evolutionary processes like random mutation and natural selection can combine and retain the useful parts as the complicated evolves to perform the complex function. The useful parts are combined into the mousetr
Read more