Piper on True Christianity

-

My last post discussed antinomianism.  The heresy of antinomianism teaches that true Christians do not necessarily perform good works.  This post deals with some of the logical out-workings of antinomianism.  True Christians will show their commitment to Christ in lives marked by good works. 

What are we to make of the oft quoted surveys of George Barna and others that show  Christians are just as likely to divorce as non-Christians, nine percent of Christians tithe (give ten percent of their income as the Bible commands), 80% of those who take pledges to wait for marriage are sexually active outside marriage in the next seven years, and 20% of Christians do not think premarital sex is wrong?     Is it true that commitment to Christ makes no difference in a person’s life?  (Statistics as quoted in Finally Alive by John Piper, p. 13) 

Keep in mind that Barna and others define Christians based on what they say they believe.  In other words, they say a person is a Christian based upon a mere profession of belief.  This is no way to define a Christian.  Anyone can say they believe anything, even when they do not really commit themselves to those beliefs. 

John Piper, in his book FinallyAlive,  makes a strong argument that these widely quoted surveys are biased because they define Christianity based on a mere profession of belief and not a life lived differently.  Piper says that “[The New Testament] moves from the absolute certainty that the new birth radically changes people, to the observation that many professing Christians are indeed (as the Barna Group says) not radically changed, to the conclusion that they are not born again” (p. 15).

True Christians are committed to lives of radical Christ-likeness.  They accept that a person cannot believe what Christ says about how to get to heaven without believing what Christ said about how to live their lives (John 3:12).  This belief in Christ’s commands will mean a life lived differently, not perfectly, but differently.  A Christian will do good works ‘as naturally as sparks fly upwards’ because he is thankful for what God has done for him inChrist.

Good works are always present in the life of a believer, but those good works are corrupted by the sin remaining in us (Isaiah 64:6).  Good works are always present, but they never save.  We can be confident of good works, but not confident in them.

Comments

Steve Martin said…
I have never heard anyone preach and teach that can take a person's assurance away from them as well as Piper can.

He's absolutely dreadful.
July 16, 2012
J. K. Jones said…
Really?

Does everyone have true assurance or are there some who need their "assurance" shaken a bit?
July 28, 2012
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Face of Terror

-
Osama Bin laden is dead. Since the rest of the internet is buzzing with opinions on that death, I thought I would weigh in. First, this is not the end of global terrorism. Like the Hydra of old, when one head is chopped off, two more take its place. We still need diligence in our fight against global terror. U. S. and allied Armed Forces still need our prayers. We still need a strong military and intelligence community. We have not yet cut off the Hydra’s immortal head. Second, the way to get to the ‘heart of the matter’ is with Christian missionary efforts. We must reach the people who make up those societies and population segments that produce terrorists . To tell a story I have told here before : Early in the twentieth century, Baptist evangelists preached through rural Mississippi and Alabama with such effectiveness that moonshiners could no longer sell their whiskey: All their customers were getting converted! In desperation, the whiskey sellers hired two men to murder on...
Read more

The Canons of Dort

-
I believe that the Canons of Dort are true. This is a statement that came out the Synod of Dort, held from 1618-1619. The Canons of Dort outline the system of theology known today as the “five points of Calvinism.” The problem I have with most “five-point Calvinists” is that the Canons of Dort contain much more than five points. Many explanations of the TULIP (total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace and the perseverance of the saints) are gross simplifications of the Canons of Dort. [This is especially true of explanations given by those who oppose Calvinism. It is easier to knock down a straw man than it is to knock down a real man, and so it is easier to criticize an oversimplified Calvinism that the more robust form.] Some of those who teach the “five points” leave out some of the quotes below: This death of God's Son is the only and entirely complete sacrifice and satisfaction for sins; it is of infinite value and worth, more than ...
Read more

Intelligent Design

-
The Intelligent Design (ID) movement makes much of the argument from irreducible complexity. Dr. Michael Behe has become famous for a simple example, the mousetrap. He points out that the mousetrap will not perform its function without all of its parts. The wooden base, the metal hammer, a spring, a catch and a metal bar to hold back the hammer are all necessary parts. One component by itself will not catch a mouse. Mainstream evolutionary science has a counter-argument. To paraphrase Dr. Kenneth Miller, if you disassemble the mousetrap, each component can serve as something useful on its own. If we take away the catch and metal bar, we have something left that can serve as a paper clip. The spring could make a simple two-section key chain. The wooden base makes a paperweight. Evolutionary processes like random mutation and natural selection can combine and retain the useful parts as the complicated evolves to perform the complex function. The useful parts are combined into the mousetr...
Read more