Affirming the Nashville Statement

-
The Nashville Statement, a statement of Christian belief on LGBT matters published by The Center for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood (CBMW), has caused many electrons to be arranged across internet pathways recently.  The Major of Nashville condemned the statement, tweeting: “The @CBMWorg's so-called "Nashville Statement" is poorly named and does not represent the inclusive values of the city & people of Nashville.” 

Other condemnation has followed, including statements from Jesuit Rev. James Martin, “a well-known Catholic priest, author and adviser to the Vatican on communications.” One video clip even seems to link the statement to the recent, white-supremacist-inspired violence in Charlotesville.

I respect many of the initial signatories on moral issues, including Rosaria Butterfield, author of The Secret thoughts of an Unlikely Convert; R. C. Sproul; Kevin DeYoung, author of What Does the Bible Really Teach About Homosexuality; J. I. Packer; and John Frame, author of The Doctrine of the Christian Life.  I do not follow human authority blindly, but these are people whose opinions I respect.  (The books mentioned and linked to all have bearing on the issues at hand.)

The criticisms leveled against this document include the idea that the LGBT community is being singled out as worse sinners than the rest of us and that the signers are somehow judging others in a way condemned by Jesus.  They also include the idea that this statement is somehow new and not directly addressed by the Bible and, by implication, the CBMW can be condemned for stating, “it is sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism and that such approval constitutes an essential departure from Christian faithfulness and witness” (Article 10). These criticisms are not valid, and the idea that condemnation of homosexual acts or transgendering is opposed to the historic Christian faith and the Bible is so outrageous as to not warrant further comment here. 

With that, I turn to two sections of the statement that I think SHOULD BE IN ALL CAPS WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS!

Article 12
WE AFFIRM that the grace of God in Christ gives both merciful pardon and transforming power, and that this pardon and power enable a follower of Jesus to put to death sinful desires and to walk in a manner worthy of the Lord.
WE DENY that the grace of God in Christ is insufficient to forgive all sexual sins and to give power for holiness to every believer who feels drawn into sexual sin.
…
Article 14
WE AFFIRM that Christ Jesus has come into the world to save sinners and that through Christ’s death and resurrection forgiveness of sins and eternal life are available to every person who repents of sin and trusts in Christ alone as Savior, Lord, and supreme pleasure.
WE DENY that the Lord’s arm is too short to save or that any sinner is beyond his reach.

These are strong affirmations.  Contrary to some who have criticized The Nashville Statement as pure, hate-filled condemnation, God has not left us hopeless over the guilt we deserve, the sin nature we are born with, or the sins we choose to commit. 

It should be noted that CBMW’s statement of faith reads, in part: “the universal sinfulness and guilt of all men and women since the Fall renders them subject to God’s wrath and condemnation.”  The organization is hardly seeking to condemn only LGBT individuals as sinners in need of salvation or even as the worst of all sinners.  We are all sinners who can be saved by the love of God expressed in Jesus Christ.


I affirm The Nashville Statement, and I have added my signature online.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Face of Terror

-
Osama Bin laden is dead. Since the rest of the internet is buzzing with opinions on that death, I thought I would weigh in. First, this is not the end of global terrorism. Like the Hydra of old, when one head is chopped off, two more take its place. We still need diligence in our fight against global terror. U. S. and allied Armed Forces still need our prayers. We still need a strong military and intelligence community. We have not yet cut off the Hydra’s immortal head. Second, the way to get to the ‘heart of the matter’ is with Christian missionary efforts. We must reach the people who make up those societies and population segments that produce terrorists . To tell a story I have told here before : Early in the twentieth century, Baptist evangelists preached through rural Mississippi and Alabama with such effectiveness that moonshiners could no longer sell their whiskey: All their customers were getting converted! In desperation, the whiskey sellers hired two men to murder on...
Read more

The Canons of Dort

-
I believe that the Canons of Dort are true. This is a statement that came out the Synod of Dort, held from 1618-1619. The Canons of Dort outline the system of theology known today as the “five points of Calvinism.” The problem I have with most “five-point Calvinists” is that the Canons of Dort contain much more than five points. Many explanations of the TULIP (total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace and the perseverance of the saints) are gross simplifications of the Canons of Dort. [This is especially true of explanations given by those who oppose Calvinism. It is easier to knock down a straw man than it is to knock down a real man, and so it is easier to criticize an oversimplified Calvinism that the more robust form.] Some of those who teach the “five points” leave out some of the quotes below: This death of God's Son is the only and entirely complete sacrifice and satisfaction for sins; it is of infinite value and worth, more than ...
Read more

Intelligent Design

-
The Intelligent Design (ID) movement makes much of the argument from irreducible complexity. Dr. Michael Behe has become famous for a simple example, the mousetrap. He points out that the mousetrap will not perform its function without all of its parts. The wooden base, the metal hammer, a spring, a catch and a metal bar to hold back the hammer are all necessary parts. One component by itself will not catch a mouse. Mainstream evolutionary science has a counter-argument. To paraphrase Dr. Kenneth Miller, if you disassemble the mousetrap, each component can serve as something useful on its own. If we take away the catch and metal bar, we have something left that can serve as a paper clip. The spring could make a simple two-section key chain. The wooden base makes a paperweight. Evolutionary processes like random mutation and natural selection can combine and retain the useful parts as the complicated evolves to perform the complex function. The useful parts are combined into the mousetr...
Read more