There are some problems that can be solved intuitively. As an engineering major I was often faced with complex problems in mathematics, chemistry, physics, and other engineering disciplines that required much thought to solve. I was often guided by my intuition, a kind of problem-solving method best describe by the phrase “AH-HA, now I see it.” I was often able to see the answer without consciously thinking through the problem. Of course, I had to go back to the beginning, reason through my answer and provide that line of reasoning to get credit for the problem on an exam. The “AH-HA method” guided me through many problems and exercises. It guides me through many decisions I make today as a manager and consultant. Of course, I have to go back to data and facts derived from observation to make my case. I must still justify my actions to others. Does this mean the “AH-HA method” is inferior? Yes, it does. Decisions should be made based on facts. We must explain the real world as we f...
Comments
Instead it just seems to be a sad way to inflate the merest scraps of conjecture of the historicity of jesus with the mountains of evidence that we have for people who actually exist.
“If there was only one source for the existence of Hitler it might actually be funny.”
There are multiplied sources for Christ’s existence. In view of the time when He lived, we have mountains of it. Please see the materials at this link (http://www.4truth.net/jesus/). You might also try my search label “Argument from Scripture.”
http://friendlyatheist.com/2010/12/06/dont-wait-up-for-jesus/
Thanks for linking to the post; I will let my words speak for themselves.
You still gave me no indication of who you are. It would help our conversation.