Hitler Never Existed?

-
A wonderful, tongue-in-check piece about revisionist history is at this link.  I cannot help but think about those people who say Jesus Christ never existed as I read this.

Comments

Anonymous said…
If there was only one source for the existence of Hitler it might actually be funny.

Instead it just seems to be a sad way to inflate the merest scraps of conjecture of the historicity of jesus with the mountains of evidence that we have for people who actually exist.
March 01, 2011
J. K. Jones said…
Is that you, Sunny Day?

“If there was only one source for the existence of Hitler it might actually be funny.”

There are multiplied sources for Christ’s existence. In view of the time when He lived, we have mountains of it. Please see the materials at this link (http://www.4truth.net/jesus/). You might also try my search label “Argument from Scripture.”
March 02, 2011
Anonymous said…
I prefer the site where your sad musings were profoundly spanked.

http://friendlyatheist.com/2010/12/06/dont-wait-up-for-jesus/
March 02, 2011
J. K. Jones said…
Considering the number of people I was arguing with, I do not believe that I received any such "spanking.”

Thanks for linking to the post; I will let my words speak for themselves.

You still gave me no indication of who you are. It would help our conversation.
March 03, 2011
Anonymous said…
Everybody knows that hitler existed but 911 was a conspiracy. the fact that you guys think hitler doesnt exist makes you RETARDED
May 15, 2012
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
May 15, 2012
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
May 15, 2012
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
May 15, 2012
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
May 15, 2012
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
May 15, 2012
J. K. Jones said…
You all are out of control.
May 22, 2012
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Face of Terror

-
Osama Bin laden is dead. Since the rest of the internet is buzzing with opinions on that death, I thought I would weigh in. First, this is not the end of global terrorism. Like the Hydra of old, when one head is chopped off, two more take its place. We still need diligence in our fight against global terror. U. S. and allied Armed Forces still need our prayers. We still need a strong military and intelligence community. We have not yet cut off the Hydra’s immortal head. Second, the way to get to the ‘heart of the matter’ is with Christian missionary efforts. We must reach the people who make up those societies and population segments that produce terrorists . To tell a story I have told here before : Early in the twentieth century, Baptist evangelists preached through rural Mississippi and Alabama with such effectiveness that moonshiners could no longer sell their whiskey: All their customers were getting converted! In desperation, the whiskey sellers hired two men to murder on...
Read more

The Canons of Dort

-
I believe that the Canons of Dort are true. This is a statement that came out the Synod of Dort, held from 1618-1619. The Canons of Dort outline the system of theology known today as the “five points of Calvinism.” The problem I have with most “five-point Calvinists” is that the Canons of Dort contain much more than five points. Many explanations of the TULIP (total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement, irresistible grace and the perseverance of the saints) are gross simplifications of the Canons of Dort. [This is especially true of explanations given by those who oppose Calvinism. It is easier to knock down a straw man than it is to knock down a real man, and so it is easier to criticize an oversimplified Calvinism that the more robust form.] Some of those who teach the “five points” leave out some of the quotes below: This death of God's Son is the only and entirely complete sacrifice and satisfaction for sins; it is of infinite value and worth, more than ...
Read more

Intelligent Design

-
The Intelligent Design (ID) movement makes much of the argument from irreducible complexity. Dr. Michael Behe has become famous for a simple example, the mousetrap. He points out that the mousetrap will not perform its function without all of its parts. The wooden base, the metal hammer, a spring, a catch and a metal bar to hold back the hammer are all necessary parts. One component by itself will not catch a mouse. Mainstream evolutionary science has a counter-argument. To paraphrase Dr. Kenneth Miller, if you disassemble the mousetrap, each component can serve as something useful on its own. If we take away the catch and metal bar, we have something left that can serve as a paper clip. The spring could make a simple two-section key chain. The wooden base makes a paperweight. Evolutionary processes like random mutation and natural selection can combine and retain the useful parts as the complicated evolves to perform the complex function. The useful parts are combined into the mousetr...
Read more